|
Accelerated Evolution of Nervous System Genes in the Origin of Homo sapiens
Steve Dorus, Eric J. Vallender, Patrick D. Evans, Jeffrey R. Anderson,
Sandra L. Gilbert, Michael Mahowald, Gerald J. Wyckoff1, Christine M.
Malcom, and Bruce T. Lahn
Abstract
Human evolution is characterized by a dramatic increase in brain size
and complexity. To probe its genetic basis, we examined the evolution
of genes involved in diverse aspects of nervous system biology. We
found that these genes display significantly higher rates of protein
evolution in primates than in rodents. Importantly, this trend is most
pronounced for the subset of genes implicated in nervous system
development. Moreover, within primates, the acceleration of protein
evolution is most prominent in the lineage leading from ancestral
primates to humans. Thus, the remarkable phenotypic evolution of the
human nervous system has a salient molecular correlate, i.e.,
accelerated evolution of the underlying genes, particularly those
linked to nervous system development. In addition to uncovering broad
evolutionary trends, our study also identified many candidate
genes—most of which are implicated in regulating brain size and
behavior—that might have played important roles in the evolution of the
human brain.
In an interview with the Guardian newspaper, Bruce Lahn elaborates --
though it is unclear if the data supports Lahn's hypothesis that
sociality may be the cause of this rapid evolution:
Human brain result of 'extraordinarily fast' evolution
Emergence of society may have spurred growth
Alok Jha, science correspondent
Wednesday December 29, 2004
The Guardian
The
sophistication of the human brain is not simply the result of steady
evolution, according to new research. Instead, humans are truly
privileged animals with brains that have developed in a type of
extraordinarily fast evolution that is unique to the species.
"Simply put, evolution has been working very hard to produce us
humans," said Bruce Lahn, an assistant professor of human genetics at
the University of Chicago and an investigator at the Howard Hughes
Medical Institute.
"Our study offers the first genetic evidence that humans occupy a unique position in the tree of life."
Professor Lahn's research, published this week in the journal Cell,
suggests that humans evolved their cognitive abilities not owing to a
few sporadic and accidental genetic mutations - as is the usual way
with traits in living things - but rather from an enormous number of
mutations in a short period of time, acquired though an intense
selection process favouring complex cognitive abilities.
Evolutionary biologists generally argue that humans have evolved in
much the same way as all other life on Earth. Mutations in genes from
one generation to the next sometimes give rise to new adaptations to a
creature's environment.
Those best adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and pass on their genes to the next generation.
<>The evolution of a large brain in humans, then, can be seen as
similar to the process that leads to longer tusks or bigger antlers. In
general terms, and after scaling for body size, brains get bigger and
more complex as animals get bigger.
But with humans, the relative size of the brain does not fit the trend
- our brains are disproportionately big, much bigger even than the
brains of other non-human primates, including our closest relatives,
chimpanzees.
Prof Lahn's team examined the DNA of 214 genes involved in brain development in humans, macaques, rats and mice.
By comparing mutations that had no effect on the function of the genes
with those mutations that did, they came up with a measure of the
pressure of natural selection on those genes.
The scientists found that the human brain's genes had gone through an
intense amount of evolution in a short amount of time - a process that
far outstripped the evolution of the genes of other animals.
"We've proven that there is a big distinction," Prof Lahn said. "Human
evolution is, in fact, a privileged process because it involves a large
number of mutations in a large number of genes.
"To accomplish so much in so little evolutionary time - a few tens of
millions of years - requires a selective process that is perhaps
categorically different from the typical processes of acquiring new
biological traits."
As for how all of this happened, the professor suggests that the development of human society may be the reason.
In an increasingly social environment, greater cognitive abilities probably became more of an advantage.
"As humans become more social, differences in intelligence will
translate into much greater differences in fitness, because you can
manipulate your social structure to your advantage," he said.
"Even devoid of the social context, as humans become more intelligent,
it might create a situation where being a little smarter matters a lot.
"The making of the large human brain is not just the neurological
equivalent of making a large antler. Rather, it required a level of
selection that's unprecedented."
|
|